Daneil Jemoch - 35% Detection Rate *

Did you just stumble upon a download or a file on your computer that is digitally signed by Daneil Jemoch? Some of the security products refers to the detected files as Malware.QVM20.Gen and Application.Win32.InstalleRex.KG. The detection rate for the Daneil Jemoch files collected here is 35%. Please read on for more details.

You will typically see Daneil Jemoch when running the file. The publisher name shows up as the "Verified publisher" in the UAC dialog as the screenshot shows:

Screenshot where Daneil Jemoch appears as the verified publisher in the UAC dialog

You can also view the Daneil Jemoch certificate with the following procedure:

  1. Open up Windows Explorer and locate the Daneil Jemoch file
  2. Right-click the file and select Properties
  3. Click the Digital Signatures tab
  4. Click the View Certificate button

Here is a screenshot of a file digitally signed by Daneil Jemoch:

Screenshot of the Daneil Jemoch certificate

As you can see in the screenshot above, Windows states that "This digital signature is OK". This implies that the file has been published by Daneil Jemoch and that the file has not been tampered with.

If you click the View Certificate button shown in the screenshot above, you can view all the details of the certificate, such as when it was issued, who issued the certificate, how long it is valid, and so on. You can also view the address for Daneil Jemoch, such as the street name, city and country.

COMODO Code Signing CA 2 has issued the Daneil Jemoch certificates. You can also see the details of the issuer by clicking the View Certificate button shown in the screenshot above.

Daneil Jemoch Files

These are the Daneil Jemoch files I have gathered, thanks to the FreeFixer users.

Detection RatioFile Name
20/5200000005
18/51Colors_2_0_For_Windows_7_Basic.rar.exe
20/5200000000
13/53Megapixel IP camera CD.zip.exe
20/53Download.exe
18/54f_000096

Scanner and Detection Names

Here is the detection names for the Daneil Jemoch files. I've grouped the detection names by each scanner engine. Thanks to VirusTotal for the scan results.

ScannerDetection Names
AVGMalSign.Generic.8E1, Generic.8E1, Generic_r.JY
Ad-AwareGen:Variant.Adware.Graftor.142020
AgnitumTrojan.AntiFW!, PUA.MultiPlug!
AhnLab-V3PUP/Win32.TSULoader
AntiVirAdware/InstallRex.ode, ADWARE/InstallRex.Gen, TR/Graftor.141601.A
Antiy-AVLRiskWare[Downloader:not-a-virus,HEUR]/Win32.AdLoad, Trojan/Win32.AntiFW.b
AvastWin32:InstalleRex-BO [PUP], Win32:InstalleRex-CD [PUP]
BitDefenderGen:Variant.Adware.Dropper.103
CAT-QuickHealTrojan.AntiFW.A5
ComodoApplication.Win32.InstalleRex.KG
DrWebAdware.Downware.2108, Trojan.WebPick.2452, Trojan.Crossrider.17268
ESET-NOD32Win32/InstalleRex.M, a variant of Win32/AdWare.MultiPlug.R
EmsisoftGen:Variant.Adware.Dropper.103 (B)
F-SecureGen:Variant.Adware.Dropper.103
GDataWin32.Application.InstalleRex.E, Gen:Variant.Adware.Dropper.103
IkarusPUA.IntallBundler, PUA.InstallBundler
KasperskyTrojan.Win32.AntiFW.b, not-a-virus:HEUR:AdWare.Win32.Agent.heur
KingsoftWin32.Troj.AntiFW.b.(kcloud)
MalwarebytesPUP.Optional.InstalleRex, Trojan.Agent
McAfeePUP-FHQ!8520DBF6C61A, PUP-FHQ!F3A8E78BC45E, PUP-FIC!B7290E0DA9E6
McAfee-GW-EditionPUP-FHQ!8520DBF6C61A, PUP-FHQ!F3A8E78BC45E, PUP-FIC!B7290E0DA9E6
MicroWorld-eScanGen:Variant.Adware.Dropper.103
NANO-AntivirusRiskware.Win32.InfoLeak.cvgqot, Riskware.Win32.Agent.cybqlz
PandaPUP/TSUploader, Trj/Genetic.gen
Qihoo-360Malware.QVM20.Gen
RisingPE:PUF.InstallRex!1.9E4C, PE:Malware.MultiPlug!6.13CF
SophosInstallRex, MultiPlug
VBA32Downloader.AdLoad, Downware.TSU
VIPRETrojan.Win32.Generic!BT, Installerex/WebPick (fs)

* How the Detection Percentage is Calculated

The detection percentage is based on that I've gathered 315 scan reports for the Daneil Jemoch files. 109 of these scan results came up with some sort of detection. If you like, you can view the full details of the scan results by examining the files listed above.

Analysis Details

The analysis is based on certificates with the following serial numbers:

Comments

No comments posted yet.

Leave a reply